Please note that it is not possible to transfer a licence from one platform to another, and we do not offer cross-grade discounts at this time.While Mac users post questions in the Scrivener MacHeads Facebook group, Windows user have two Facebook groups: Scrivener for Windows and Scrivener Webinars and Tips for Windows. There has to be a better piece of book writing software than Microsoft Word.”However, if you are buying Scrivener for macOS and Scrivener for Windows at the same time, we do have a special bundle discount available. Once you’re comfortable with using the files on your PC you can delete the files on your Mac.When you’re writing a book, you might come to this point where exasperation turns to desperation and you think: “There has to be a better way. Test it out for a few days, or weeks, before you delete your Mac file. DO NOT DELETE THE ORIGINAL FILE ON YOUR MAC YET Open the file in Scrivener on the PC and see if it works as expected. Copy your file to a USB drive and then load it on your PC.And especially when you’re writing something as complicated as book, you might want a piece of writing software geared specifically toward writing a book.I’m also waiting for a Windows version of Scrivener 3. Whether its Windows, Mac, iOs or Android, you will be able to download the.Microsoft Word is the default word processor, but that doesn’t mean it’s the only option. Wherever you post a question, there are plenty of helpful Scrivener users keen to help.Moved to London to become a professional photographer.
Move Scrivener For Windows To Mac Users PostHow Scrivener Saved Me 250 Hours Writing a BookIn 2010, I was writing what would become my first book when I got to a point where Word became impossible. Ulysses does not have an Export to Word function, but Scrivener does and if you use Endnote.Plus, check out our Top 10 Pieces of Software for Writers for more tools to help you write better and faster. In this post, we’re going to look closely at two of the best pieces of book writing software: Microsoft Word and Scrivener, and talk about where each word processor shines and where each falls short.And one of my favorite Mac software titles is Ulysses. But in the mean time why don’t you get a used macbook air (2012-2015 models) on ebay for like 300 and use mac version of. I can’t open a project saved on a Mac using current Scrivener Windows version. ![]() Let’s compare the two, specifically as book writing software: Microsoft WordMicrosoft Word is available in both PC versions ($115) and Mac versions ($124). Word: Which Is Better Book Writing Software?Both Scrivener and Microsoft Word are effective word processors, but each thrives when used for specific tasks. But I believe Scrivener saved me hundreds of hours of time, not to mention frustration.I’ve finished six books on scrivener, not to mention half-a-dozen short stories, and I every day I learn new ways to use it, depending on the needs of my project.But let’s break down Microsoft Word and Scrivener’s features so we can see what each is best at. The second book, written with Scrivener, took me only 200 hours.Of course, some of this was because it was my second book and I had refined my process. And its effectiveness showed in my productivity.My first book, written solely with Microsoft Word, took me 550 hours to write. Word’s track changes feature is great for collaborating with an editor. For example, most editors edit books in Word and therefore require their clients to submit manuscripts in Word formats (.doc).Great for editing. And that is a huge advantage for writing a book. Since almost everyone has Microsoft Word and knows how to use it, it makes it very easy to collaborate using it. That makes it easy to see what your formatting will look like from the start and make changes along the way.Simple. For most people, Microsoft Word was one of the first programs they ever used on a computer. The way your book looks on the screen as you type it is the same way it will look on the page when you print: if you write the entire book in 18 pt Papyrus font, it’ll stay that way when you send it to an editor or print out a hard copy (and they will be sad because 18 pt Papyrus is a terrible idea). Word is a “what you see is what you get” word processor (WYSIWYG or Wizy-wig), and as such, it’s really effective. (However, since Google Docs added “Suggestion mode,” which is the equivalent to track changes, I’ve started using it almost exclusively in replacement of Word for the editing process.)Great formatting. In fact, for most of my books, I moved them from Scrivener to Word for the editing process to take advantage of this feature. Very handy for polishing up your final draft. ![]() Even after it opened, I would have to wait until it loaded the pages below. After I reached 30,000 words, every time I opened up my book, it took several minutes to load. For me, this was 30,000 words. Because Word wasn’t originally designed for documents as large as books, as your book grows, it becomes more and more unwieldy.Gets slow after you get over certain sizes. It’s possible, but definitely a hassle. (Note: Now, I use Vellum for this. You have to format every header and chapter title with “Heading 1” and “Heading 2,” remove all indents, save the document in HTML, upload to Kindle, check the proof for formatting errors (which there inevitably are), and then start over. You almost always have to use a program called Sigil, an epub editor, to clean up the file before you publish it. I’ve personally used Word to publish several books on Kindle, Nook, and other online retailers. But the problem is that as your book grows it becomes more and more difficult to work with. You can use Word to write books. Overall:Fine but annoying. It’s free, too, which is nice. That’s mainly because of its “binder feature,” which is a simple but game-changing advance for word processors. While Microsoft Word gets more and more difficult to use the bigger your document gets, Scrivener gets more and more useful as your document grows. Pros:Made specifically for writing books. Visual studio ide c for macScrivener honestly has more features than I need, but one that I use constantly is Project Targets, which allows you to set a deadline and projected word count for your draft and then see how many words you have to write each day to meet that deadline. Here are just a few:Project targets. But fortunately, there are dozens of features that make Scrivener awesome for book writing. Notice the Binder on the left with all my chapters, sections, and even supporting documents.Features specifically designed for each step of the book writing process. If the Binder mode was the only difference, then Scrivener would instantly be so much better than Word for writing books. It’s SO freeing! Trust me, you’re going to love it.Here’s a screenshot of my latest book in Scrivener. Formatting is clunky on Scrivener. We’ll be reviewing it soon!) Cons:Formatting is frustrating. (Again, Vellum is even easier and makes much more beautiful eBooks. One of Scrivener’s selling points is that you can export directly to Kindle and ePub file types, making it much easier to publish your book than Word. Scrivener recently released its iOS app ( you can find it here), which you can sync with your desktop and then write and edit your book wherever you are.Fair publishing support. That means you can customize your writing space to write however you’d like without worrying about messing up how your book will look (or making your editor sad with 18 pt Papyrus). You might write your book in white 18 pt Papyrus on a blue background, but when you prepare it to print, it will format the book according to different formatting settings you’ve selected, like black 12 pt Times New Roman. For example, while Word is a “what you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) word processor, Scrivener has chosen to apply formatting mainly when you compile the document for print or export. And it just keeps getting better. Overall:Scrivener is the premier book writing software. Personally, after I finish my second draft and start working with editors, I prefer Google Docs. Also, like Word, Scrivener has some track changes and commenting features so that you can collaborate with an editor, but they’re not as easy to use or convenient as Word’s. Part of this is because Scrivener is just not as ubiquitous as Word, and so if your editor doesn’t have it, you’re forced to switch to Word, the industry standard. When you’re working with an editor, or even a co-author, Scrivener gets difficult.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorNate ArchivesCategories |